1.中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广东 广州 510006
2.广东省公共安全与灾害工程技术研究中心 / 广东省城市化与地理环境空间模拟重点实验室, 广东 广州 510006
刘晔(1986年生),男;研究方向:城市人居环境与健康福祉、新型城镇化、人口迁移流动;E-mail:liuye25@mail.sysu.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2025-01-15,
网络出版日期:2024-08-27,
收稿日期:2024-04-16,
录用日期:2024-05-11
移动端阅览
刘晔,叶柏麟,吴景豪.基于手机信令数据的广州市居民公园访问行为空间分异及其影响因素分析[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文),2025,64(01):195-206.
LIU Ye,YE Bailin,WU Jinghao.The spatial divergence of park visits of Guangzhou residents and its influencing factors based on mobile phone signaling data[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni,2025,64(01):195-206.
刘晔,叶柏麟,吴景豪.基于手机信令数据的广州市居民公园访问行为空间分异及其影响因素分析[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文),2025,64(01):195-206. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.acta.snus.ZR20240121.
LIU Ye,YE Bailin,WU Jinghao.The spatial divergence of park visits of Guangzhou residents and its influencing factors based on mobile phone signaling data[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni,2025,64(01):195-206. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.acta.snus.ZR20240121.
加快推进城市公园建设是实现人与自然和谐共生的重要抓手。既有研究大多基于问卷调查数据和访谈资料分析城市居民的公园访问行为空间分异特征,研究结论的普适性和科学性有限。手机信令数据具有大样本、覆盖范围广、信息被动提供和动态实时性强等优点。利用手机信令数据精准刻画城市居民的公园访问行为,有助于开展城市公园的布局优化与品质提升工作。基于个体尺度的手机信令数据,本研究试图揭示广州市居民公园访问行为的空间分异特征并识别其影响因素,尤其关注城区居民和郊区居民的差别。结果表明:(1)城区居民的公园访问频率、公园访问时长和公园访问强度均高于郊区居民,前者的公园平均访问距离低于后者;(2)公园访问频率、公园访问强度、公园平均逗留时间和公园平均访问距离呈现高值集聚区/低值集聚区在城区连片分布,在郊区零星分布的空间特征;(3)公园访问行为受性别、年龄、时空约束性、社会经济地位、公园可达性、社区出行便利性和出行适宜性等因素的共同影响。本研究为相关政府部门精准开展城市公园的规划、建设与管理工作提供决策参考。
Constructing more urban parks facilitates the achievement of harmonious coexistence between human beings and nature. Most existing studies about residents' park-visiting behavior are based on questionnaire survey data and interview data to analyse the characteristics of spatial differentiation
limiting the universality and scientificity of the conclusions. Mobile phone signaling data offers advantages such as large samples
wide-coverage
passive information provision
and strong real-time dynamics. Utilizing mobile phone signaling data to identify urban residents' park visits accurately can assist in the optimization of urban park layout and quality improvement. Based on individual-scale mobile phone signaling data
this study aims to reveal the spatial differentiation of park visits of Guangzhou residents and identify influencing factors
particularly focusing on the differences between urban and suburban residents. The results show that: 1) the frequency
duration
and intensity of park-visiting of urban residents are higher than those of suburban residents
and the average park-visiting distance of the former is shorter than that of the latter; 2) the frequency
intensity
and duration of park-visiting and average park-visiting distance show the spatial characteristics of high- / low-value accumulation of an extensive distribution in urban areas and sporadic distribution in the suburbs; 3) park-visiting behaviour is jointly influenced by gender
age
temporal and spatial constraints
socio-economic status
park accessibility
community travel convenience
and travel appropriateness. This study provides decision-making reference for relevant government departments to effectively carry out the planning
construction
and management of urban parks.
城市公园公园访问行为空间分异手机信令数据广州
urban parkpark visitspatial variationmobile phone signaling dataGuangzhou
方家, 刘颂, 王德, 等, 2017. 基于手机信令数据的上海城市公园供需服务分析[J]. 风景园林,(11): 35-40.
李斌. 2008. 环境行为学的环境行为理论及其拓展[J]. 建筑学报,(2): 30-33.
李宇珅, 刘晔, 黄柏石, 等, 2024. 肇庆市老年人口健康水平的人居环境影响因素[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文), 63(1): 45-55.
刘颂, 杨莹, 贾虎, 2021. 基于手机信令数据的上海市社区公园服务半径及影响因素研究[J]. 风景园林, 28(6): 88-93.
刘晔, 何嘉锐, 王若宇, 等, 2023. 城市绿色空间对心理健康的影响:研究进展与展望[J]. 热带地理, 43(9): 1747-1759.
钮心毅, 康宁, 2021. 上海郊野公园游客活动时空特征及其影响因素——基于手机信令数据的研究[J]. 中国园林, 37(8): 39-43.
史云贵, 2023. 以人民为中心的公园城市演进逻辑与绿色治理路径[J]. 天津社会科学,(5): 46-52.
苏婷婷, 李欢, 马嘉, 等, 2023. 公园城市理念下的城乡公园体系构建与优化研究——基于国内外实践[J]. 城市发展研究, 30(4): 37-41.
王志鹏, 王薇, 邢思懿, 2021. 城市公园绿地特征和使用方式与人群健康关系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 45(5): 223-231.
姚雪松, 冷红, 魏冶, 等, 2015. 基于老年人活动需求的城市公园供给评价——以长春市主城区为例[J]. 经济地理, 35(11): 218-224.
朱战强, 刘冰, 符家颖, 2022. 邻里绿色空间对休闲性体力活动的影响:个人属性的调节作用——以广州市为例[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文), 61(6): 15-27.
BEDIMO-RUNG A L, MOWEN A J, COHEN D A, 2005. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health[J]. Am J Prev Med, 28(2): 159-168.
CHEN S, CHRISTENSEN K M, LI S, 2019. A comparison of park access with park need for children: A case study in Cache County, Utah[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 187: 119-128.
CHIESURA A, 2004. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 68(1): 129-138.
DONAHUE M L, KEELER B L, WOOD S A, et al, 2018. Using social media to understand drivers of urban park visitation in the Twin Cities, MN[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 175: 1-10.
GONG P, CHEN B, LI X, et al, 2020. Mapping essential urban land use categories in China (EULUC-China): Preliminary results for 2018[J]. Sci Bull, 65(3): 182-187.
GU X, LI Q, CHAND S, 2020. Factors influencing residents’ access to and use of country parks in Shanghai, China[J]. Cities, 97: 102501.
GUO S, YANG G, PEI T, et al, 2019. Analysis of factors affecting urban park service area in Beijing: Perspectives from multi-source geographic data[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 181: 103-117.
HEGETSCHWEILER K T, VRIES S, ARNBERGER A, et al, 2017. Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: A review of European studies[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 21: 48-59.
LI F, LI F, LI S, et al, 2020. Deciphering the recreational use of urban parks: Experiments using multi-source big data for all Chinese cities[J]. Sci Total Environ,701: 134896.
LIANG H, ZHANG Q, 2021. Temporal and spatial assessment of urban park visits from multiple social media data sets: A case study of Shanghai, China[J]. J Clean Prod, 297: 126682.
MCINTIRE R K, HALSTEAD T, DAJEE D, et al, 2022. Disparities in neighborhood park access among adults in Philadelphia[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 78: 127790.
ROSSI S D, BYRNE J A, PICKERING C M, 2015. The role of distance in peri-urban national park use: Who visits them and how far do they travel?[J]. Appl Geogr, 63: 77-88.
SCHIPPERIJN J, EKHOLM O, STIGSDOTTER U K, et al, 2010. Factors influencing the use of green space: Results from a Danish national representative survey[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 95(3): 130-137.
WRIGHT WENDEL H E, ZARGER R K, MIHELCIC J R, 2012. Accessibility and usability: Green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 107(3): 272-282.
XIAO Y, WANG D, FANG J, 2019. Exploring the disparities in park access through mobile phone data: Evidence from Shanghai, China[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 181: 80-91.
YANG H, ZHANG Q, HELBICH M, et al, 2022. Examining non-linear associations between built environments around workplace and adults’ walking behaviour in Shanghai, China[J].Transp Res Part A:Policy and Pract, 155: 234-246.
ZHANG J, TAN P Y, 2019. Demand for parks and perceived accessibility as key determinants of urban park use behavior[J]. Urban For Urban Gree, 44: 126420.
ZHANG S,ZHOU W2018. Recreational visits to urban parks and factors affecting park visits—Evidence from geotagged social media data[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 180: 27-35.
0
浏览量
115
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构