1.西北大学城市与环境学院 / 陕西省地表系统与环境承载力重点实验室,陕西 西安 710127
2.黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室,陕西 西安 710061
高兴(1994年生),男;研究方向:历史蝗灾与环境变迁;E-mail:Cartny@outlook.com
李钢(1979年生),男;研究方向:人地关系与空间安全,灾害地理与社会地理;E-mail: lig@nwu.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2021-11-25,
网络出版日期:2021-05-27,
收稿日期:2020-08-21,
录用日期:2020-09-09
扫 描 看 全 文
高兴,李钢,王星星等.1635—1643年中国群聚性灾害的时空演进与气候背景[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2021,60(06):71-79.
GAO Xing,LI Gang,WANG Xingxing,et al.Spatiotemporal process and climatic background of clustering disasters in China during 1635-1643[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni,2021,60(06):71-79.
高兴,李钢,王星星等.1635—1643年中国群聚性灾害的时空演进与气候背景[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2021,60(06):71-79. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.acta.snus.2020D042.
GAO Xing,LI Gang,WANG Xingxing,et al.Spatiotemporal process and climatic background of clustering disasters in China during 1635-1643[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni,2021,60(06):71-79. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.acta.snus.2020D042.
近年来灾害地理视角下的历史灾害研究重点考察特定地域与时间序列,重大灾害个案复原亟需关注。明末崇祯八至十六年(1635—1643年)发生的旱、蝗、饥、疫群聚性灾害无论从持续时长、受灾范围还是灾情等级来看都较为罕见。通过整理历史文献构建群聚性灾害数据集,以旱、蝗为主线复原群聚性灾害的时空演进与相互关联,探讨群发性灾害的气候背景。结果表明:① 各灾种演变均呈单峰“快增慢减”态势,但峰值年份不同。旱灾、蝗灾、饥荒在1638—1641年灾情较重,疫灾经历较长的孕灾期,在1641年达到顶峰;② 旱灾广泛分布于东部季风区,黄淮海流域与长江下游沿线是核心灾区;蝗灾暴发相对集中,聚集在黄河下游沿线及河网湖泊周边,体现显著“水缘性”特征;③ 相对于旱灾,蝗灾暴发存在显著空间相关性和时间承继性,饥荒呈现一定滞后性。旱情显著提升蝗灾的暴发强度,重度旱灾下蝗灾等级显著增加;④ 在明清小冰期,连续的极端冷干气候加剧蝗灾暴发,或与大尺度环流等外部变化相关,且灾害链发模式加剧了灾情。
In recent years, the study of historical disasters from the perspective of disaster geography focuses on spatiotemporal evolution and series analysis, and the recovery of historical clustering disasters needs attention. The clustering disasters such as drought, locust plagues, famine and epidemic disaster occurred during the 8
th
to 16
th
Chongzhen years (1635-1643) in the late Ming Dynasty were relatively rare in terms of duration, scope, and level. By sorting out the historical documents and constructing the data set, this paper takes drought and locust plagues as the line to recover the spatiotemporal evolution and correlation between clustering disasters, and clarify the climatic background of this period. The results show that: (1) The development of disasters presented a single peak type of “fast increasing followed by slow decreasing” trend, but the peak years were different. Drought, locust plagues and famine were severely affected during 1638-1641. The epidemic had a lag period and reached its peak in 1641. (2) The drought was widely distributed in the eastern monsoon region of China, and the Huang-Huai-Hai Basin and the lower reaches of the Yangtze River were the core affected areas. The outbreak of locust plagues was relatively concentrated along the lower reaches of the Yellow River and around the lakes, which reflected the obvious “water approaching characteristic”. (3) Compared with drought, locust plagues showed significant spatial correlation and temporal succession, and famine and epidemic disaster presented a lag. Drought significantly promoted the outbreak intensity of locust plagues. (4) During the Little Ice Age, continuous extreme cold and dry climate aggravated the outbreak of locust plagues, which may be related to large-scale circulation or other external environment changes, and the pattern of the disaster chain multiplied the intensity of the situation.
群聚性灾害蝗灾时空演进气候背景明朝末期(1635—1643年)
clustering disasterslocust plaguesspatiotemporal processclimate backgroundlate Ming dynasty(1635-1643)
卜风贤.中国农业灾害史研究综论[J].中国史研究动态,2001(2):2-9.
黄荣辉.我国重大气候灾害的形成机理和预测理论研究[J].地球科学进展,2006,21(6):564-575.
山克强.历史朝代兴替的气候冷暖变化背景[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2010.
史培军.再论灾害研究的理论与实践[J].自然灾害学报,1996,5(4):8-19.
刘倩,李钢,杨新军.明末1637—1643年极端干旱事件研究[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2014,44(5):833-837.
张德二.中国历史气候记录揭示的千年干湿变化和重大干旱事件[J].科技导报,2004(8):47-49.
鞠明库.明代河南旱灾与社会应对[J].华北水利水电学院学报(社科版),2010,26(5):110-113.
郭丛.明崇祯年间陕西地区旱荒与社会应对研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2014.
姜雪娜.明末辽东地区水旱灾害及社会应对[D].长春:吉林大学,2009.
郑云飞.中国历史上的蝗灾分析[J].中国农史,1990(4):38-50.
满志敏.明崇祯后期大蝗灾分布的时空特征探讨[M]//历史地理.第6辑.上海:上海人民出版社, 1988:232-244.
章义和.中国蝗灾史[M]. 合肥:安徽人民出版社,2008.
张德二.中国三千年气象记录总集[M]. 南京:凤凰出版社,2013.
张允,赵景波.近200年来关中地区干旱灾害时空变化研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008(7):94-98.
张冲,赵景波,张淑源.渭河流域汉代洪涝灾害研究[J].地理科学,2011,31(9):1151-1156.
张涛.明代疫灾时空分布及环境机理研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2015.
范毓周.殷代的蝗灾[J].农业考古,1983(2):314-317.
葛全胜,王顺兵,郑景云.过去5 000年中国气温变化序列重建[J].自然科学进展,2006,16(6):689-696.
张学珍,郑景云,方修琦, 等.1470—1949年山东蝗灾的韵律性及其与气候变化的关系[J].气候与环境研究,2007,12(6):788-794.
张德二,陈永林.由我国历史飞蝗北界记录得到的古气候推断[J].第四纪研究,1998(1):3-5.
STIGE L C, CHAN K S, ZHANG Z B, et al. Thousand-year-long Chinese time series reveals climatic forcing of decadal locust dynamics[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2007, 104(41):16188-16193.
席勒·考斯鲁德,田会东.过去是未来的钥匙 — 气候变化与社会历史的联系[J].自然与科技,2011(6):40-42.
YI L, YU H J, GE J Y, et al. Reconstructions of annual summer precipitation and temperature in north-central China since 1470AD based on drought/flood index and tree-ring records[J]. Climatic Change,2012,110:469-498.
LIU Y Q, DING Y H. Influence of EL Nino on weather and climate in China[J]. Acta Meterologica Sinica, 1992,6(3):117-131.
李崇银.中国东部地区的暖冬与厄尼诺[J].科学通报,1989(4):283-286.
于革,刘健.全球12 000 aBP以来火山爆发记录及对气候变化影响的评估[J].湖泊科学,2003(1):11-20.
SIMKINT T, SIRBERT L.Volcanoes of the world[M].2nd ed. Tucson: Geoscience Press Inc,1994: 26-33.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构