Absorption characteristics of CDOM in the Pearl River Estuary at flood and ebb tides
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-12-11
|
Absorption characteristics of CDOM in the Pearl River Estuary at flood and ebb tides
Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis SunYatseniVol. 57, Issue 2, Pages: 22-31(2018)
作者机构:
1. 珠江水利科学研究院,广东,广州,510611
2.
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2018,
Published Online:25 March 2018,
扫 描 看 全 文
HE Yingqing, QIN Yan, FENG Youbin, et al. Absorption characteristics of CDOM in the Pearl River Estuary at flood and ebb tides. [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis SunYatseni 57(2):22-31(2018)
DOI:
HE Yingqing, QIN Yan, FENG Youbin, et al. Absorption characteristics of CDOM in the Pearl River Estuary at flood and ebb tides. [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis SunYatseni 57(2):22-31(2018)DOI:
Absorption characteristics of CDOM in the Pearl River Estuary at flood and ebb tides
located at the downstream of the Pearl River Delta
receives freshwater from multisources and is an active transition zone between river environments and maritime environments. The variation of water optical properties with tide remains to be further studied. Based on the fixed point measurement during 4 days in the Pearl River Estuary
The averaged CDOM (chromophoric dissolved organic matter) concentration a
g
(355) is 1.01±0.31 m
-1
at flood tide while the value is 1.18±0.37 m
-1
at ebb tide. It shows the temporal feature that the values at ebb tide are higher than those at flood tide. From the spatial dimension
a
g
(355) inside the estuary entrance is higher than that outside. It fluctuates weakly both inside the estuary entrance at ebb tide and outside the entrance at flood tide. The averaged S
g
(spectral slope of CDOM absorption coefficient) is 0.018 6±0.002 9 nm
-1
at flood tide and it shows a lower value (0.017 7±0.002 3 nm
-1
) at ebb tide. The values at ebb tide are closer to each other in space. S
g
has significantly positive correlation with the molecular size M (absorbance ratio between 250 and 365 nm)
both of them show high values at flood tide. In addition
there is remarkable negative correlation between a
g
(355) and salinity for the outer estuary. And the correlation at ebb tide is superior to that at flood tide. However they have no common bond inside the entrance during flood season. Therefore
the optical properties of CDOM at ebb tide appear to be more stable
particularly for those of the inner estuary. And the tidal effects should be considered in retrieving water quality parameters from remote sensing data.